Showing posts with label Thriller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thriller. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 April 2018

Traffik

Traffik (2018)

Traffik directed and written by Deon Taylor. Movie star Paula Patton, Omar Epps, Laz Alonso, Roselyn Sanchez, Luke Goss, William Fichtner and Missi Pyle, and following a group of friends who were terrorized by a group of bikers in a remote country house. It was released on April 20, 2018 by Summit Entertainment.

Country: USA
Language: English
Release: 20 April 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 96 min
Director: Deon Taylor
Writer: Deon Taylor
Stars: Paula Patton, William Fichtner, Missi Pyle

Journalist Brea, and her boyfriend John, travel from the coast to the mountains for a romantic weekend. At a gas station along the way, they are accosted by a group of men on motorcycles. They continue on to their secluded rental home, unaware that they have come into possession of a mobile phone. The phone is important to a group of sex traffickers which the bikers are desperate to retrieve.

There's a new wave of great brothas out there writing and directing. As a black man, it's exciting to see brothas (and sistas) making moves and comin up. But this is another sad example of the mediocrity and drivel that gets funded and marketed, and then in turn sets black directors and writers back a few steps. The movie is boring. Nothing about this is tense or interesting. All the characters are one-dimensional, and predictable.

Still not sure how an international sex trafficking ring really played that much into this. Oh, and what's with spelling it TRAFFIK? Traffick would have worked, and made more sense. But just like the title spelling, the rest of the movie didn't make sense. Omar Epps is straight to Blu Ray now, and they just went and found the most stereotypical white boys they could get. But Paula Patton....daaaymn.

That girl is hot! But it's not worth the $$ just to see a few scenes with her in little clothing. The writer/director of this movie is the same dude that made other embarrassments like Chain Letter and Nite Tales. OH, and if you read his bio...dude lies.

He didn't play at SDSU, he was there for one year and left because he wasn't a starter. He didn't get a degree there, either. And he didn't play pro ball. Everything about this movie, just like the director, is straight bulls**t. Don't waste your time, bruh.



Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Chappaquiddick

Chappaquiddick (2017)

Chappaquiddick 2017 is a film directed by John Curran and written by Taylor Allen and Andrew Logan. Movie star Jason Clarke as Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy and Kate Mara as Mary Jo Kopechne, with Ed Helms, Bruce Dern, Jim Gaffigan, Clancy Brown, and Olivia Thirlby in supporting roles. The plot details the Chappaquiddick events of 1969, in which Senator Kennedy drove his car to the lake that killed Kopechne, and the subsequent political and social consequences.

Country: Sweden | USA
Language: English
Release Date: 6 April 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 106 min
Director: John Curran
Writers: Taylor Allen, Andrew Logan
Stars: Jason Clarke, Ed Helms, Jim Gaffigan
Stars: Emily Blunt, John Krasinski, Millicent Simmonds

The scandal and mysterious events surrounding the tragic drowning of a young woman, as Ted Kennedy drove his car off the infamous bridge, are revealed in the new movie starring Jason Clarke as Ted Kennedy and Kate Mara as Mary Jo Kopechne. Not only did this event take the life of an aspiring political strategist and Kennedy insider, but it ultimately changed the course of presidential history forever.

Through true accounts, documented in the inquest from the investigation in 1969, director John Curran and writers Andrew Logan and Taylor Allen, intimately expose the broad reach of political power, the influence of America's most celebrated family; and the vulnerability of Ted Kennedy, the youngest son, in the shadow of his family legacy.

A part of the town of Edgartown, Massachusetts is a small island on the eastern end of Martha's Vineyard known as Chappaquiddick. It's famous because on July 18, 1969, a 1967 Oldsmobile carrying U.S. Senator Edward M. Kennedy (Jason Clarke, "Mudbound"), then 36, and Kennedy staffer Mary Jo Kopechne (Kate Mara, "Megan Leavey"), 28, plunged off the Dike Bridge killing the young woman. Though Kennedy escaped, the tragedy forever ended his presidential ambitions. The accident and its surrounding events are dramatized in John Curran's Chappaquiddick, the first filmed version of the event. It is a strangely lifeless film, however, which halfheartedly struggles to present Kennedy in a sympathetic light, but ends up portraying a character that is weak and opportunistic.

Written by Taylor Allen and Andrew Logan whose script relies on the historical record including the inquest into the accident, Australian actor Clarke plays Kennedy in a rather wooden manner, providing little hint of the Kennedy charm. To many, Ted Kennedy represented the hope that the idealism of his fallen brothers Jack and Bobby would be rekindled. The dream died in stages beginning with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963 followed by that of his brother Bobby five years later.

Unanswered questions surround all of these events, however, and what happened at Chappaquiddick is no clearer after watching the film. Some of the basic facts about the incident are these (some are still in dispute): The Senator, in Edgartown for the annual regatta he had missed the previous year because of Bobby's death, had just left a party for his brother Robert's former campaign staffers at a small cottage in Chappaquiddick to drive one of the so-called "boiler room girls," Mary Jo Kopechne, to catch the last ferry back to Edgartown. Though the Senator later claimed that she felt sick and asked to be driven to the ferry, the fact that she left her purse and her keys at the party may suggest that she intended to return. Drinking took place at the party, but whether the Senator was involved is uncertain.

Though Kennedy said that he left the party at 11:15 p.m., a deputy sheriff reported seeing a car that matched Kennedy's with a man and a woman inside near the turn-off for the beach at 12:45 a.m. - an hour and a half after Kennedy said the accident had occurred. Ignoring signs pointing to the ferry, the car turned right onto a dirt road and went off the Dike Bridge (which had no guardrails) and plunged into the water killing Mary Jo, though the exact time and cause of her death is unknown since no autopsy was ever performed. Though urged by his cousin Joe Gargan (Ed Helms, "Vacation") and former U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Paul Markham (Jim Gaffigan, "The Living Wake") to go to the police, Kennedy did not report the accident for ten hours after it occurred, though he had several opportunities to call along the way back to the cottage. Kennedy later claimed that he dove repeatedly "into the strong and murky current" to try and find Kopechne but to no avail. In his nationwide televised address, Kennedy suggested that a concussion played a role in warping his judgment. "I was overcome," he said, "I'm frank to say, by a jumble of emotions: Grief, fear, doubt, exhaustion, panic, confusion and shock."

No doubt at his overbearing father's (Bruce Dern, "Nebraska") urging, Kennedy's inner circle of confidants met to offer some damage control, knowing that the Senator's political future was on the line. These associates included former U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara (Clancy Brown, "Hail, Caesar!"), Kennedy speechwriter Ted Sorensen (Taylor Nichols, "Freeloaders"), and brother-in-law Steve Smith (Victor Warren, "My Daddy's in Heaven"). Determined to overcome his misfortune, Kennedy agreed to tell the truth (at least his version of the truth, as he so charmingly puts it) and ask the people of Massachusetts to weigh in on whether or not he should resign. The support he received from his constituents was overwhelming and he was easily reelected the following year.

Though charges of involuntary manslaughter were possible, Kennedy was convicted only of leaving the scene of an accident, but the lasting political consequences far exceeded the legal. Despite what the film may suggest, many questions remain. We still have no idea of the exact nature of the relationship between the Senator and Mary Jo, whether or not Kennedy had been drinking when he got in the car, how he escaped from the sinking car, whether Mary Jo died of drowning or of suffocation, why she was found in the back seat of the car, why Kennedy waited ten hours before reporting the incident, and why his stories were so full of contradictions.

Since there were no witnesses to the accident, the only person who knows the full truth was Kennedy and he died in 2009. We can still surmise, guess, and speculate which is basically what Curran and his writers do. Ultimately, Chappaquiddick is ambiguous, illuminating neither the truth behind the events on that summer night, nor the contradictions in Kennedy's character. What is clear, however, is that neither Kennedy, his political associates, his attorney, nor the Edgartown police emerged with their reputations unscathed, and even Kennedy's lifetime of service in the fight for a more just society would ever change that.



Principal photography began in Boston in September 2016. The film originally premiered at the Gala Presentations section at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 10, 2017, and was released in the United States on April 6, 2018, by Entertainment Studios. It received generally positive reviews from critics, with praise for its balanced screenplay and Clarke's performance.

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Tuesday, 17 April 2018

The Endless

The Endless (2017)

The Endless is a 2017 horror film directed by Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead and written by Justin Benson. The film stars Justin Benson, Aaron Moorhead, Callie Hernandez, Tate Ellington, Lew Temple and James Jordan. The film was released on April 6, 2018, by Well Go USA Entertainment.

Title: The Endless
Country: USA
Language: English
Release Date: 6 April 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 100 min
Directors: Justin Benson, Aaron Moorhead
Writer: Justin Benson
Stars: Callie Hernandez, Emily Montague, James Jordan

The film follows two brothers who receive a cryptic video message inspiring them to revisit the UFO death cult they escaped a decade earlier. Hoping to find the closure that they couldn’t as young men, they’re forced to reconsider the cult’s beliefs when confronted with unexplainable phenomena surrounding the camp. As the members prepare for the coming of a mysterious event, the brothers race to unravel the seemingly impossible truth before their lives become permanently entangled with the cult.

Two brothers return to the cult they fled from years ago to discover that the group's beliefs may be more sane than they once thought.

This film is more clever than it first appears, because it operates on at least two levels. On the surface, it is a taut, well-crafted horror story about a (possible) "death cult". We have some mysterious rituals, a missing husband, and seemingly silly camp activities that may – or may not – have a darker purpose.

Some of this is vaguely alluded to in the opening quote from H. P. Lovecraft, and further still during the lake "reveal". The scare quotes here are just because what is revealed at this moment is entirely up to the imaginations of the viewer. A certain Lovecraft story may provide a guide, or it may be merely a coincidence or red herring. But once the big reveal comes, everything goes dark, and the suspense truly becomes horror.

The subcutaneous level is focused on a theme: the truth of religion, either this one or religion in general. Though this film really only explores the reality of one (fictional) religion, it does make us wonder: what if some religions we find strange are actually right? With so many religions in the world, it is certainly possible that one or more are correct. And if the strangest ones might be right, we ought to question our own beliefs: do we believe correctly? With so many choices, it is hard to say for sure.

Though this deeper meaning may not have been intentional, it nevertheless exists and makes the film even more interesting. The filmmakers previously had a hit with "Resolution" (2012), but all signs point to "The Endless" being an even bigger success. The film played at Tribeca Film Festival on April 21, and will no doubt be seen by a wider audience throughout 2017.

Source from: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2395427/reviews?ref_=tt_urv

The film premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival on April 21, 2017. On May 1, 2017, Well Go USA Entertainment acquired distribution rights to the film. The film was released on April 6, 2018, by Well Go USA Entertainment.


Cast
Justin Benson as Justin Smith
Aaron Moorhead as Aaron Smith
Callie Hernandez as Anna
Tate Ellington as Hal
Lew Temple as Tim
James Jordan as Shitty Carl
Shane Brady as Shane Williams
Kira Powell as Lizzy
David Lawson Jr. as Smiling Dave
Emily Montague as Jennifer Danube
Peter Cilella as Michael Danube
Vinny Curran as Chris Daniels
Glen Roberts as Woods

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Saturday, 14 April 2018

Acrimony

Acrimony (2018)

Tyler Perry's Acrimony is a 2018 American psychological thriller film produced, written, and directed by Tyler Perry. The film stars Taraji P. Henson, Lyriq Bent, Jazmyn Simon, and Crystle Stewart, and follows a loyal wife who decides to take revenge on her unfaithful husband. Principal photography began in October 2016 in Pittsburgh.

Title: Acrimony
Country: USA
Language: English
Release: 30 March 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 120 min
Director: Tyler Perry
Writer: Tyler Perry
Stars: Taraji P. Henson, Lyriq Bent, Crystle Stewart

The movie begins with a court scene, the judge admonishing Melinda for her behavior and advising her to attend therapy to avoid harsher consequences such as jail time. She glares at the other side of the courtroom and has to be nudged by her attorney to reply she understands. She attends a therapy session resentful at having to be there and begins telling her story of betrayal to the court appointed counselor. She begins by describing how she met Robert as they crashed into each other on campus. Their schoolwork gets exchanged accidentally and Robert locates her dorm room to return her papers to her and reclaim his own. There is an instant attraction and he offers to help her with her paper as he's already taken the class. And they begin working together and seeing each other. Melinda fails the assignment and as she's telling Robert about the sacrifice her mother is making to send her to school she sees her two sisters walk up. They give her the news that her mother has passed away.

Melinda Moore (Ajiona Alexus & Taraji P. Henson) tries to fulfill her parent's dream of obtaining a college education. On her way home from studying, Melinda runs into Robert Gayle (Antonio Madison & Lyriq Bent), and the two develop a fast friendship. As their relationship develops at the dismay of Melinda's meddling family, will the couple live happily ever after, or will their behavior tear them apart?

Writer-director Tyler Perry (Good Deeds, For Colored Girls, The Family That Preys) delivers a surprisingly nuanced thriller with Acrimony. The cinematography, script and story are all first rate, which allows the actors to shine and deliver outstanding performances.

Ajiona Alexus lights up the screen as the younger version of Melinda, while Taraji P. Henson delivers a true descent into madness with her portrayal of the older, present-day Melinda. Lyriq Bent as the mature Robert becomes more of a sympathetic character than the viewer might have expected due to his excellent ability to embody Robert's humanity.

Make no mistake - the film is not high art, nor does it pretend to be. We are treated to a bleak depiction of human nature as well as an honest portrayal of mental illness. Fortunately, Mr. Perry has an excellent sense of humor - even at their most depraved, the characters manage to make us guffaw with laughter.


Acrimony was released in the United States by Lionsgate on March 30, 2018.

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

I Kill Giants

I Kill Giants (2017)

I Kill Giants is a 2017 fantasy thriller film directed by Anders Walter with a screenplay by Joe Kelly, based on Kelly and Ken Niimura's graphic novel of the same name. The film stars Madison Wolfe, Imogen Poots, Sydney Wade, Rory Jackson and Zoe Saldana.

Title: I Kill Giants
Country: Belgium | UK | USA
Language: English
Release Date: 23 March 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 106 min
Director: Anders Walter
Writers: Joe Kelly (screenplay by), Joe Kelly (based on the action graphic novel "I Kill Giants" created by)
Stars: Madison Wolfe, Zoe Saldana, Imogen Poots

Twelve-year-old Barbara Thorson flees from reality, leaving in the imaginary world of fantasy and magic, where she fights with giants. Her family does not understand her, peers do not like her, and she irritates teachers. And only recently moved here Sofia, her same age, trying to make friends with her.

This review contains SOME spoilers as I mention juts the opening three scenes, but I don't speak about the entire movie. If you don't mind reading about the first 8 minutes of the film, read on.

Just when you thought Harry Potter and Disney movies held the title for promoting witchcraft and teaching it to our young, this movie opens with the main character, a little girl named Barbara, whipping up "potions" and applying it to trees in a forest. The next scene shows her writing in a book in which it shows various potions of different colors and their ingredients. After this, she removes her heart shaped purse, sprinkles glitter all over it, kisses it, then closes her eyes and incants "Long Be Unbroken" before blowing the excess glitter onto the desk.

Next scene has her brother playing video games and telling his friend that he would not get "laid" with his haricut, comparing it to his own. Barbara, sitting at the dining table playing what looks like a Dungeons and Dragons board game, tells him that he should play a real game, use some imagination and save electricity. She gets so frustrated with her brothers swearing and loud gaming that she rolls the dice and then unplugs the TV stating that she "cast" a blackout spell to see if her brother would survive it then says "See? Isn't that fun?" to which he proceeds to grab the dice off the table and shoves it in the food just prepared by the sister. So far, this has proven to be a movie I would not show to my own child.

The next scene shows Barbara sitting by herself outside, staring at the ocean. Her sister comes out and says that she would play her "dragons" game if she asked. Then she tells her that it wouldn't kill her to wash a dish every now and then. Just when you thought that the two sisters were going to bond and poor Barbara was going to have love shown to her, the sister receives a phone call and walks away from Barbara, complaining about her brother and sister, leaving Barbara all alone again. Barbara mutters "Dishes. You really need to prioritize" meaning that dishes were not a priority. Then takes out a device that she unfolds into a mini telescope, in which she uses it to look out at sea at one of the "giants" in the water. I'll mention here that the device looks like it is made of various shaped and sized crystals, which would further denote the witchcraft in this movie. My recommendation is to keep your children far from this movie. It is bad enough we have kids running around with wands and reciting various Harry Potter spells out there.

The premise of the movie is clear. A young girl who can't cope with her own life of woes, escape into a fantasy world, which is unhealthy, and thus a school counselor/psychologist gets involved to help with her with her issues head on. Needing to see a psychiatrist at such a young age tells me that Barabara's family just isn't there for her, takes no notice of her, doesn't love her enough to spend time with her and talk with her about her issues in life, which should be very small due to her young age. Everything from bullies in school to her home life with her siblings. Barbara herself is not a very nice or sociable person herself. When she meets a new friend, Sophia, she treats her like dirt, as well as Mrs. Molle, the school counselor. I can understand why this girl doesn't have any friends and people treat her indifferently or bully her. She brings it upon herself by her "shut-in" attitude and thus having this high and mighty air about her as she counts off various "talisman's" she left in various places in school, supposedly to ward off evil or these "giants."

Barbara is constantly reciting various spells and incantations as she performs various things like sewing a baseball glove. And when asked by Sophia "what's with the ears?" the bunny ears she wears throughout the film, Barbara replies "Tribute to my spirit guide." Not only is there a lot of witchcraft in the movie there is now a mention of Indian folklore. I suppose the writer wanted to push several ideas into the movie to reach our children and call it fun and adventure and fantasy.

I cannot recommend this film to anyone and I wasn't surprised to find out that the film was produced by the same people who produced Harry Potter. Witchcraft and magic seems so prevalent in our society and in Hollywood these days and it is such a shame that these writers, directors, producers and film studios continuously push the issue and even worse, push it on our youth. I expect it from Disney because they have been promoting witchcraft, magic, wishes and dreaming, a far escape from reality, since day one. If you're going to show your young ones this movie, keep in mind the content or watch it first and then judge for yourself whether it is right for your children.


Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Red Sparrow

Red Sparrow (2018)

Red Sparrow is a thriller film directed by Francis Lawrence and written by Justin Haythe, based on a 2013 novel of the same name by Jason Matthews. The film stars Jennifer Lawrence, Joel Edgerton, Matthias Schoenaerts, Charlotte Rampling, Mary-Louise Parker, and Jeremy Irons. It tells the story of a Russian intelligence officer sent to make contact with a CIA agent in the hope of finding the identity of a mole.

Title: Red Sparrow
Country: USA
Language: English | Russian
Release: 2 March 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 140 min
Director: Francis Lawrence
Writers: Justin Haythe (screenplay by), Jason Matthews (based upon the book by)
Stars: Jennifer Lawrence, Joel Edgerton, Matthias Schoenaerts

Dominika Egorova is many things. A devoted daughter determined to protect her mother at all costs. A prima ballerina whose ferocity has pushed her body and mind to the absolute limit. A master of seductive and manipulative combat. When she suffers a career-ending injury, Dominika and her mother are facing a bleak and uncertain future. That is why she finds herself manipulated into becoming the newest recruit for Sparrow School, a secret intelligence service that trains exceptional young people like her to use their bodies and minds as weapons. After enduring the perverse and sadistic training process, she emerges as the most dangerous Sparrow the program has ever produced. Dominika must now reconcile the person she was with the power she now commands, with her own life and everyone she cares about at risk, including an American CIA agent who tries to convince her he is the only person she can trust.

This is the first large picture recently that actually had a challenging and interesting plot, which I enjoyed, especially the ending. I did not find it especially violent compared to many other films, and the nudity hyped in the preview is actually rare and strictly plot related, not gratuitous. This is a harsh film, but that is the subject matter it deals with, and it is well done, not the frivolous treatment espionage usually gets in a shaken not stirred manner.

I liked this film, and found it very entertaining, and it had a story I felt really captured the dangerous and stressful situations in the spy world. Probably not for everyone, but if you want a good edgy thriller, this is it. The cast was very good, everybody brought their best game in my view. Those that trashed the cast have a real credibility problem.

Not perfect, but a lot better than many recent film escapades getting much better reviews, so judge for yourself. If you like a serious thriller, you will enjoy this.



Red Sparrow premiered at the Newseum in Washington, DC on February 15, 2018, and was released in the United States on March 2, 2018, and is worldwide. The film also received mixed reviews from critics, who described it as having "more style than substance," and criticized the length of the film and relied too heavily on graphic violence and sex, while praising the appearance of Jennifer Lawrence.

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Thursday, 12 April 2018

Fifty Shades Freed

Fifty Shades Freed (2018)

Fifty Shades Freed is an erotic drama film directed by James Foley and written by Niall Leonard, and based on a novel of the same name by E. L. James. This is the third and final installment in the Fifty Shades movie series, following Fifty Shades of Gray (2015) and Fifty Shades Darker (2017). The film stars Dakota Johnson and Jamie Dornan as Anastasia Steele and Christian Gray, respectively, and follows the couple when they get married, and has to deal with former Ana (Eric Johnson) boss, who starts stalking them.

Title: Fifty Shades Freed
Country: USA
Language: English
Release Date: 9 February 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 105 min
Director: James Foley
Writers: Niall Leonard (screenplay by), E.L. James (based on the novel by)
Stars: Dakota Johnson, Jamie Dornan, Eric Johnson

Believing they have left behind shadowy figures from their past, newlyweds Christian and Ana fully embrace an inextricable connection and shared life of luxury. But just as she steps into her role as Mrs. Grey and he relaxes into an unfamiliar stability, new threats could jeopardize their happy ending before it even begins.

Hopefully, as a heterosexual female student in her mid twenties, saying this before the male critic hating and age generalisations continue, with a love of film that spreads across all genres and decades, this will come over as a fair assessment of a film that genuinely did nothing for me. Very like what was said with the first two 'Fifty Shades' films.

As was said before, my main reasons for seeing 'Fifty Shades Freed', wanting to see as many films of this year and of the latter half of 2017 (some released in my country this year) and that it just happened to be the film choice of a friend cinema film outing. General consensus of the group for the record being indifference and passionately hating it. Not because of wanting to hate it (have always aimed to be a fair and perceptive reviewer), following the crowd (have been known to go against the grain) or being someone who hates everything (generally am a positive reviewer and try to see the good in even awful films). And yes, am telling the truth about seeing it, have never reviewed a film without watching it.

Oh and the whole "why did you even watch it" rubbish, from those who denounce anybody who dislikes the film as trolls for having a different opinion, needs to stop, because it comes over as ignorant and disrespectful. People are allowed to judge whatever they want and the two most common reasons for seeing a film is completest sake (if trying to see as many films of the year as possible) and family and friend film nights and cinema outings, so that answers that question.

Which is the case here in 'Fifty Shades Freed'. Am not going to give it the lowest rating on IMDb, this is an extremely rare rating for me these days and reserved only for incompetently made films with no effort put into them. 'Fifty Shades Freed' has very little good with it, but there are also a few things good. It is the best of the 'Fifty Shades' trilogy, as there is a little more plot than the previous two, sadly this is not saying much.

Some of the soundtrack beguiles, it has a soothing nostalgia and appropriately amorous quality. Those lovely moments in the soundtrack, which should have been maintained more consistently, is the best thing about 'Fifty Shades Freed'.

It also looks good, nice use of scenery and very nicely shot. There is one acting bright spot, which is Marcia Gay Harden who does very well with her role and is too conscientious an actress.

However, the same flaws are all here. Other parts of Danny Elfman's score are one-note and repetitive, as well as too derivative of his recent work. He has composed some wonderful stuff ('Edward Scissorhands' is magical) but this is really not his best work. The same goes with director James Foley, whose direction is far too mannered and ill at ease, he has done some great stuff like 'Glenngarry Glenn Ross' and 'House of Cards' and when you compare his work on those and that for his contribution to the 'Fifty Shades' films it's like somebody else entirely.

Regarding the cast, only Harden is good. The rest fail to register in one-dimensional and in many cases underwritten and under-utilised roles. Eric Johnson phones it in at some parts and overdoes it in others as the painfully clichéd villain. More problematic once more are the two leads, and the chemistry is next to zero once more. Understated can be a lovely quality to acting, as long as it also becomes nuanced and with believability given to the dialogue. Dakota Johnson, especially in the first third, is too understated that it feels more like there is a lack of personality or emotion. Jamie Dornan looks uncomfortable throughout, delivers his cringe-worthy lines awkwardly and is just bland as dishwater with no charisma whatsoever. Chemistry is non-existent.

Again, the dialogue does no favours, dialogue so bad that absolutely nobody (even the best actors and actresses) can do anything with it. It would even be beneath actors and actresses who can't act to save their lives, and there is just as plenty of those around. It causes unintentional laughter throughout, is embarrassingly clunky and is pure smut. Then there is the story, even though it is the film with the most plot it still is so thin structurally, heavy in repetition, so badly plodding and without style or atmosphere that the film feels twice as long. Even with attempts to give more raunchiness and kinkiness, as well as edge, none of what goes on comes over naturally. Everything is horribly contrived and silly, with a climax that feels out of place and conflict that lacks tension and is instead unintentionally silly. The sex scenes are passionless and less than erotic.


Filming of Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed begins on February 9, 2016 in Paris and Vancouver. The film is planned to be released on February 9, 2018.

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Maze Runner: The Death Cure

Maze Runner: The Death Cure (2018)

Maze Runner: The Death Cure is a 2018 science fiction action film directed by Wes Ball and written by T.S. Nowlin, based on The Death Cure novel written by James Dashner. The film is a sequel to the 2015 movie The Maze Runner: Scorch Trials and is the third and final film in the Maze Runner series. The film stars Dylan O'Brien, Kaya Scodelario, Thomas Brodie-Sangster, Dexter Darden, Nathalie Emmanuel, Giancarlo Esposito, Aidan Gillen, Walton Goggins, Ki Hong Lee, Jacob Lofland, Katherine McNamara, Barry Pepper, Will Poulter, Rosa Salazar and Patricia Clarkson.

Title: Maze Runner: The Death Cure
Country: USA
Language: English
Release: 26 January 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 141 min
Director: Wes Ball
Writers: T.S. Nowlin (screenplay by), James Dashner (based upon the novel "The Death Cure" by)

Thomas leads his group of escaped Gladers on their final and most dangerous mission yet. To save their friends, they must break into the legendary Last City, a WCKD-controlled labyrinth that may turn out to be the deadliest maze of all. Anyone who makes it out alive will get answers to the questions the Gladers have been asking since they first arrived in the maze.

The first movie to this trilogy had an interesting gimmick: a dynamic maze filled with dangerous creatures. When this is removed, you take away the most interesting part of the movie. That is why the sequel performed so poorly in the box office. The second movie could be summarized as a bunch of bland characters walking on a desert. This third and final film is better than its predecessor, but that is not saying much.

The plot boils down to a group of characters rescuing one of the friends, Minho, of the protagonist, Thomas, while some people work on the cure for a virus. The virus is of course as unoriginal as possible (it turns the infected into the stereotypical zombie). The plan to save Minho is ridiculous, it consists of putting him and other people immune to the virus in a bus, lift it with a crane from the inside of the city and drop it outside of the walls that border it. Of course, the bumpers must have been incredibly strong since they remain attached to the bus when it is lifted by the crane, plus the immune kids must also be invisible because none of them die or are hurt when the bus falls.

I must say I have a couple of questions. Why do mainstream movies have to end with "epic" explosions? Why are the main characters always being shot at when they are running, but they are asked nicely to calm down and to surrender when they have nowhere to go until a deus ex machina appears? Why does the bad guy, the one trained to kill people, who has an army at his command armed to the teeth, playing catch up with a bunch of teenagers for 30 min? If the first five times when he almost caught them were not exciting, do you think the next twenty will be? Are we supposed to care about Teresa's death? Didn't the movie spend 2/3 of its time painting her in a bad light? You know, the untrustworthy chick? Where is the character arc? Where is the plot twist? The suspense?

Apart from the weak story, the acting is mediocre, and the directing was full of problems too. Instead of the action being fluid, it is shot by sections making it look clumsy and awkward. For example, there is a scene where one of the good guys throws a grenade, but instead of being thrown and it exploding, there a shot of it being thrown, a show of it shown where it lands, a zoom in of the faces of the bad guys looking at each other worried because it is going to explode, it exploding from a different angle, and a shot of the good guys celebrating. This type of editing removes the fluidity of a shot and disconnects you from it. I could go on and one, but I think I made my point.



The film was originally to be released on February 17, 2017 in the United States by 20th Century Fox, but the studio rescheduled the movie on January 26, 2018 in theaters and IMAX, as it was Dylan O'Brien's recovery from injuries he suffered while filming. The film received mixed reviews of criticism and has grossed $ 192 million worldwide on February 9, 2018.

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Proud Mary

Proud Mary (2018)

Proud Mary is an action thriller directed by Babak Najafi, from a scenario written by John S. Newman and Christian Swegal. The film stars Taraji P. Henson, Billy Brown, Danny Glover, Neal McDonough, Xander Berkeley, Margaret Avery, and Jahi Di'Allo Winston, and follows a murderer who must look after a young teenage boy after a failed job.

Teitle: Proud Mary
Country: USA
Language: English | Russian
Release: 12 January 2018 (USA)
Runtime: 89 min
Director: Babak Najafi
Writers: John Stuart Newman (screenplay by), Christian Swegal (screenplay by)

A hit woman kills a drug boss only to learn that she has left a boy orphaned. A year later, she saves the boy from a dangerous life on the street but finds herself unable to give the boy or herself a fresh start.

By this time, we all know what to expect from a Screen Gems Movie. This is the same studio that has made a living producing small budget films to the urban community like Obsessed, No Good Deed, and When the Bough Breaks. While they have all maintained solid profitability, I have found all of their filmmaking and writing severely lacking any thrills and under utilizing their lead actors. So I found myself walking into Proud Mary expecting a familiar feeling, but a slight sense of naive optimism.

Mary (Taraji P. Henson) plays a hitman who learns she kills the parent of a young boy during a assigned hit. Over the year, she oversees his wellness and takes him in and notices the strain it brings between her and her higher up (Danny Glover) and her previous lover (Billy Brown).

While some of the films budget limits can be seen, the film is able to bring some decent performances from Billy Brown and some decent "gun-fu" action. The finale has a fleeting moment of some engaging action, but it feels all too brief and too dimly lit to take in the stunt's Taraji did. There are fleeting moments when the film is able to not take itself so seriously, particularly one scene when the credits begin to roll which I wish the film committed itself to that certain feeling more often.

While I am not surprised the boss subplot is irrelevant, it still amazes me how little we know about Mary as a character. Her backstory is almost inexistent, which is bothersome given she's such a motherly character but still feels too locked to her own thoughts. The villain's also have no gravitas, as they never physically challenge Mary and feel like faceless dummies to show off Taraji's fighting abilities. And the little boy can be very annoying and all over the place at times. One moment he plays as a hardened street kid and the next a whiny child.

Proud Mary thankfully isn't the disaster I was worried it would be, but it's not as committed to the over the top action I wished it was. While the mother-son dynamic allows for a softer criminal, the emotional impact doesn't feel earned. The 70s music choices are on the nose at times, but loosens up the film at points. To put it simply, Proud Mary comes to the fight strapped with a half empty clip.


Film ini was released on January 12, 2018, by Screen Gems, which was also the firm's production company

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Geostorm

Geostorm (2017)

Geostorm is a 2017 American disaster film[1] directed, co-written, and produced by Dean Devlin as his feature film directorial debut. The film stars Gerard Butler, Jim Sturgess, Ed Harris, Abbie Cornish, Richard Schiff, Alexandra Maria Lara, Robert Sheehan, Daniel Wu, Eugenio Derbez, and Andy García. The plot follows a satellite designer who tries to save the world from a storm of epic proportions caused by malfunctioning climate-controlling satellites.

Title: Geostorm
Country: USA
Language: English | Cantonese | Russian | Hindi | Spanish
Release Date: 20 October 2017 (USA)
Runtime: 109 min
Director: Dean Devlin
Writers: Dean Devlin, Paul Guyot
Stars: Gerard Butler, Jim Sturgess, Abbie Cornish

When catastrophic climate change endangers Earth's very survival, world governments unite and create the Dutch Boy Program: a world wide net of satellites, surrounding the planet, that are armed with geoengineering technologies designed to stave off the natural disasters. After successfully protecting the planet for three years, something is starting to go wrong. Two estranged brothers are tasked with solving the program's malfunction before a world wide Geostorm can engulf the planet.

In Geostorm, Earth is beset by natural disasters. In facing adversity, mankind developed a satellite station to prevent these catastrophes. While people overcame this problem, another conflict arises when it becomes opportune to use the technology as a weapon for sole global domination.

The setting in which the story takes place, you can say, parallels our own at the present in which we are experiencing technological advancements which perks we use to solve our crises but also create further dilemma as countries individually vie to be the world superpower.

Going to see the movie, I wasn't expecting much for it because it seemed like a so-so movie that's probably been done before only re- released with a "semi different plot" under a different title. But I was surprised by how entertaining it is. There's the timeliness of its subject, there's definitely humor (which is funny but I thought they somehow overdid with some of the dialogue) but this one has also dramatic scenes that would touch you. The pathos really got me emotionally involved with what the characters are experiencing. This aspect I really enjoyed.

The downside, I can still say that it seems a lot of it's contents were borrowed from/ inspired by previous natural disaster/sci-fi flicks such as Day After Tomorrow ( look at one of its posters for instance), Armageddon, and Gravity to name a few. This might be a turnoff for moviegoers who are expecting originality and it will most likely be so but for me, I got over it and had myself a good time in the cinema. It is definitely not the best movie this year or ever but its up there with the good, entertaining ones I really enjoyed watching this year.



Principal photography began on October 20, 2014, in New Orleans, Louisiana. After poor test screenings, re-shoots took place in December 2016 under executive producer Jerry Bruckheimer, writer Laeta Kalogridis and new director Danny Cannon. The film is the first co-production between Skydance Media and Warner Bros. The film was released by Warner Bros. in the United States on October 20, 2017, in 2D, Real D 3D and IMAX 3D. Despite grossing $221 million worldwide the film was labeled a box office bomb given its $120 million budget, losing the studio $74 million, and received negative reviews, with criticism focused on the "uninspiring" story and "lackluster" visual effects.

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Annabelle: Creation

Annabelle: Creation (2017)

Annabelle: Creation is a 2017 American supernatural horror film directed by David F. Sandberg and written by Gary Dauberman. It is a prequel to 2014's Annabelle and the fourth installment in The Conjuring series. The film stars Stephanie Sigman, Talitha Bateman, Lulu Wilson, Anthony LaPaglia, and Miranda Otto, and depicts the possessed Annabelle doll's origin.

Title: Annabelle: Creation
Country: USA
Language: English | Spanish
Release Date: 19 June 2017 (USA)
Director: David F. Sandberg
Writers: Gary Dauberman, Gary Dauberman (based on characters created by)
Stars: Anthony LaPaglia, Samara Lee, Miranda Otto

The manufacturer of dolls Samuel Mullins is a happy family man with his wife Esther and their daughter Bee, who dies after being hit by a car. Twelve years later, Samuel and his wife, Esther, welcomes a nun and six orphaned girls to his home. He tells that only a locked room (that belonged to Bee) and Esther's room would be off limits for the girls. The crippled girl, Janice, manages to sneak in Bee's room during the night and finds a doll locked inside a closet. After she plays in the room, she is haunted by an evil force. What has Janice unleashed in Bee's room.

A prequel of Annabelle, which was the prequel of The Conjuring. Absolutely nobody asked for this. Nobody wanted this. No one. But, thankfully (surprising, right?) we got it.

Annabelle: Creation has no business being this good. Funny enough, the same can be said about 2016's Ouija: Origins of Evil. It is strange that these two bizarrely similar films were released within a year of each other. Both follow up on terrible first films. Both are prequels of those terrible first films. Both shouldn't have been made. Both are extremely effective horror films. Oh, and both star the excellent child-actor Lulu Wilson. The similarities don't even end there.

After the film ended and I saw who directed this, everything made more sense. David F. Sandberg has the reins here–who you might remember from directing Lights Out, another surprisingly great 2016 horror flick. The work done in that movie with the use of lighting and repetition is just as suspenseful here (if not more so, in some scenes). Sandberg thankfully stamps what could have been run-of-the- mill horror scenes with his signature creativity. Horror largely relies on the talent of the director, and this is a case of the direction only elevating the film.

While Lulu Wilson is a definitely a standout in her second straight horror movie role, her counterpart Talitha Bateman also gives a great performance. As in most horror movies, most of the scares are seen through the eyes of the children in the film. Luckily, the two youngest actresses here–Wilson and Bateman–practically act circles around the rest of the cast. In fact, there were quite a few moments when I felt as though these two actresses deserved a better script. The pair definitely do the best they can with what they are given however, adding a great deal of character to this film.

The bar is low when it comes to horror film scripts. Even the best of the genre still have the occasional cringe-worthy line or plot hole (The Conjuring 2, I'm looking at you). All this to say, I'm going to go easy on the faults of Annabelle: Creation's script. The writing here is not bad by any means. There are cringy lines here and there, but that is to be expected. The characters make extremely poor choices, but even that is to be expected. The problem rests almost solely in the dull first 30 minutes of this film.

Look, I'm all for slow burn horror movies. But when the star of your horror film is an inanimate object, you just can't afford to have a slow opening act. However, once this film starts picking up with the scares in the latter half of the film, much of that first act can be forgiven. The film goes in some unexpected directions towards the end of the film which adds some surprising creativity.

No spoilers of course, but the way the first Annabelle is tied in to this film is outstanding. So outstanding that it almost makes up for the 90 minutes I wasted sitting through the garbage that was that first film. Almost.

Credit to director David F. Sandberg for rescuing this franchise from a tedious first film. Annabelle: Creation is legitimately scary, which is all you can really ask for from a horror film.


Annabelle: Creation premiered at the LA Film Festival on June 19, 2017, and was theatrically released in the United States on August 11, 2017. The film has grossed over $306 million worldwide and received generally positive reviews from critics, who praised the atmosphere and acting, and noted it as an improvement over its predecessor.


Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

John Wick: Chapter 2

John Wick: Chapter 2 (2017)

John Wick: Chapter 2 is a 2017 American neo-noir action thriller film directed by Chad Stahelski and written by Derek Kolstad. The second installment in the John Wick film series, the plot follows hitman John Wick, who goes on the run after a bounty is placed on his head. It stars Keanu Reeves, Common, Laurence Fishburne, Riccardo Scamarcio, Ruby Rose, John Leguizamo and Ian McShane, and marks the first collaboration between Reeves and Fishburne since appearing together in The Matrix trilogy.

Title: John Wick: Chapter 2
Country: USA | Hong Kong
Language: English | Italian | Russian
Release Date: 30 January 2017 (USA)
Runtime: 122 min
Director: Chad Stahelski
Writers: Derek Kolstad, Derek Kolstad (based on characters created by)
Stars: Keanu Reeves, Riccardo Scamarcio, Ian McShane 

Bound by an inescapable blood debt to the Italian crime lord, Santino D'Antonio, and with his precious 1969 Mustang still stolen, John Wick, the taciturn and pitiless assassin who thirsts for seclusion, is forced to visit Italy to honour his promise. But soon, the Boogeyman will find himself dragged into an impossible task in the heart of Rome's secret criminal society, as every killer in the business dreams of cornering the legendary Wick who now has an enormous price on his head. Drenched in blood and mercilessly hunted down, John Wick can surely forget a peaceful retirement--but above all--in this lethal ballet of bullets, can he make it out in one piece

The coolest bit of lore about the first movie is completely lost in the sequel. That alone is a sin you cannot redeem yourself for. In the original, it was established canon that John Wick was not a man to mess with. Even the main villain, respected and feared his abilities.

In John Wick 2, however, all of that is gone. Nobody fears John Wick. Nobody is afraid to take him on. His past deeds and reputation mean absolutely squat.

The new villain, never thinks twice about double crossing Wick. Every hit-man on the planet, and according to this movie they are every where, has no qualms about trying to take Wick out.

Sin 2: No main character growth In the first movie, we travel along with Wick as he avenges his dog and in the end moves forward with his grief. The video of his wife tells him to get up and move on. In John Wick 2, there is zero character growth. He is no different at the end of the movie as he is when it starts. Sure his circumstances have been altered, but as a character he has overcome nothing. That makes for a boring story.

Sin 3: Weak plot The original movie had a simple, but strong plot. Revenge. The plot of the sequel is weak, even by action movie standards. Wick has been called into service to kill a criminal, if he refuses he dies... but wait if he accepts, he also dies. The whole movie could have started and ended with the original premise of refusing the contract. It would have made more sense to refuse the contract and fight off the baddies coming to enforce the blood oath.

Sin 4: Video Game Bad Guys Wow. There is evidently a plethora of John Wick cannon fodder. They just keep coming, and there really is no logical reason why they do. The body count is so high that it becomes comical. The original had a big body count, but it was divided among 5 big action scenes and, for an action movie, seemed plausible. This one doubles the body count but there are so many, the coolness of each kill is lost in an over abundance of victims.

Sin 5: Invincible Superhero Hit by two cars, stabbed and shot numerous times and he just keeps on going. Must be seeing the doctor and getting pain pills, right? Nope no doctors in this one. That kind of logical realism may interfere with the killing of cardboard bad guys. At one point a fellow assassin, holds a pistol point blank in Wick's abdomen and fires a couple shots through him. No biggie Wick has another 42 bad guys to kill.

Sin 6: James Bond Gadgets I love the Continental, don't get me wrong, but the secret underground hit-man hosting hotel just goes too far in this one. Bulletproof suit coats that can be held up like Batman's cape to shield yourself from bullets? Silencers so quiet that two adversaries can have a shootout in a subway between bystanders and nobody knows even though bullet holes are being blasted into the walls around them?

Sin 7: Shallow Villains Yes there are the 140 plus cardboard video game baddies, but in the first John Wick, the main villain had a moral dilemma: turn over his son to save his own butt. The bad guys in Wick 2 have no interesting character motivation or dilemmas. The closest you get is Common's desire for revenge after Wick kills his client. And that was the most interesting bad guy on the screen. It is hard to believe the two movies were written by the same folks.

Sin 8: Soundtrack John Wick 1 had an unbelievable soundtrack that actually set the mood as he moved through the action scenes and the emotional scenes. This soundtrack just plain sucks. There is nothing memorable in it, and it does little to impart any emotion on a given scene.

Sin 9: Pacing Even the big action scenes in this movie are too long. In their desire to up the body count they went with longer action sequences. It really messes with the pace of the film. The first movie did a great job of dividing the action and keeping the viewer engaged. The longer these scenes go, the less believable they became which pulls the audience out of the moment.

Sin 10: Rehashing things that worked in the first movie There are some great scenes in the first Wick, and the director knew that so they tried to repeat them. This is a classic sequel mistake and unfortunately Wick 2 falls victim to this trope. You liked the interaction with Jimmy? We will get another one in there. Like the reload and kill? We will put a twist on that one also. It was great to see the pencil kills, that is how it should be done. Don't show us the same thing but different. Show us new, that may have been mentioned previously.

Making the next sequel look better then this one. The end of this movie sets up a very interesting plot for a third movie and almost everyone that walked out was excited to see it. That is wonderful, except when that movie actually sounds more interesting then the one you just watched. You should have just made that movie instead.



Principal photography began on October 26, 2015, in New York City. The film premiered in Los Angeles on January 30, 2017, and was theatrically released in the United States on February 10, 2017. It received positive reviews from critics and grossed $171.5 million worldwide, over four times its $40 million budget and nearly twice the $88 million gross of the original film.[3][4] A sequel, titled John Wick: Chapter 3, is set to be released on May 17, 2019.

Thank you for your visit to our website, for any criticism and suggestions for the development of this website into the future, please leave a comment, in the comments field below. And do not forget to like or share to social media to give tau to other friends.

See also
Taglines | Synopsis | Plot Keywords | Parents Guide

Followers

Movie Storry. Powered by Blogger.